examination to Maharani Hospital, Jagdalpur. The petitioner got examined by the concerned medical officer at 2.05 am on 5.10.2016 where the Doctor conducting MLC noticed 6 injuries and referred for x-ray of the concerned part of the body. Despite this fact the concerned criminal court allegedly asked the petitioner that whether he was assaulted or not and whether he received any injury and observed that on being asked, the petitioner states that he was not beaten nor he was having any injury over his body. On behalf of the petitioner, it is submitted that the petitioner was not asked for the said facts nor he replied as mentioned in the order sheet. Even otherwise when the petitioner was examined by the concerned medical officer conducting MLC on the request of the petitioner to the concerned police on the basis of a written report filed, the concerned court ought to have looked into the diary papers and initially satisfy whether there is any MLC of the petitioner or not. It goes to show that the concerned criminal court may be under any pressure with the resolution and the memo filed by the Members of the District Bar Association, Jagdalpur. Learned counsel further added to his argument and submits that as the petitioner has been deprived to defend himself through a lawyer of his choice and also looking to the entire conduct, the resolution passed, he had an apprehension in his mind that he may not get justice within the territorial jurisdiction. Consequently, prayed that the said remand proceedings may be transferred to another appropriate district for further enquiry and trial as per provisions of law.
