The High Court rejected the applicant's application for anticipatory bail. Holding that custodial interrogation was likely required, the court refused to extend the benefit of Section 438 Cr.P.C. and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.CR.C.(A) No. 735 of 2016
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. J.K. Saxena, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order On Board
11/08/2016
Page No.2
Sd/(Goutam Bhaduri) Judge
Balram
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant apprehending arrest in a criminal case involving offences under the Indian Penal Code.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Swarup Ranjan Sharaf
The State of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
