The High Court dismissed the applicant's application for anticipatory bail in a case involving assault and looting, noting the applicant had absconded and parity with cos-accused could not be applied.
Dismissal of the application for grant of anticipatory bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.CR.C.(A) No. 475 of 2016
----Applicant
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Nand Kumari Kashyap, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order On Board
16/06/2016
Page No.2
get his name deleted from the charge-sheet, however, the chargesheet having been filed, the same could not be done. Therefore, the counsel prays that the applicant may be extended the benefit of anticipatory bail.
Sd/(Goutam Bhaduri) Judge
Balram
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant apprehending arrest for offences under Sections 394, 397 and 324 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arshad @ Ashad, S/o. Faij Ahmad
State of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
