Single Judge order dismissing an anticipatory bail application. The court held that the prosecution case and wife's admission regarding an unpaid loan for employment services precluded the extension of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
The application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.CR.C. (A) No. 329 of 2016
Ranjit Singh S/o. Chain Singh, aged about 31 years, R/o. Kashi Nagar, Korba, Tahsil and District Korba (C.G.)
---- Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through – Station House Officer, Police StationKotwali, (outpost Rampur) District Korba (C.G.)
---- Respondent
For Applicant :- Mr. R.S. Baghel, Advocate For Respondent/State :- Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order on Board
08/04/2016
(Goutam Bhaduri) JUDGE
Santosh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant for offences under Sections 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Whether the prosecution case and admission by the wife disclose a sufficient ground to deny the benefit of Section 438 Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ranjit Singh S/o. Chain Singh
State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Kotwali
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
