This order dismisses an application for anticipatory bail filed by two accused against the State. The High Court refused bail citing that the applicants are absconding, a reward for information has been offered, and custodial interrogation may be required.
Application for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.CR.C.(A) No. 315 of 2016
Versus
---- Respondent
For Applicants : Mr. Ashok Verma, Advocate For Respondent/State : Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board
04/04/2016
Page No.2
Sd/(Goutam Bhaduri) Judge
Balram
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when the applicants are absconding a reward for information is announced.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Ram Kumar
Rewant Gabel
State of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
