High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected first bail application in theft case where applicant alleged false implication and claimed to have reported missing mobile, but State denied such report.
Bail application rejected; applicant not released on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 7416 of 2016
Versus
For the applicant : Mr. S.C. Verma, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Vivek Singhal, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order on Board
06.12.2016
rejected.
Sd/-
GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE
R a o
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant entitled to regular bail under Section 439 CrPC in theft case.
Whether false implication and non-registration of missing report report amounts to ground for bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pravin @ Pradeep Shukla
State of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
