In a second bail application regarding theft and forgery charges, the High Court refused to evaluate evidence on the merits as the trial was incomplete. Finding no change in circumstances since the first dismissal, the court dismissed the bail plea.
The second bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 7397 of 2016
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. Aman Kesharwani, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Anil S. Pandey, G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order on Board
20-12-2016
applicant, thereafter the complainant has lodged report against the applicant for the offence under Sections 379, 413, 420, 467.468.471,120-B read with Section 34 of the IPC.
Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge
Raju
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. should be allowed given the pendency of the trial and lack of fresh circumstances.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Habib Miyan S/o Ajeet Miyan
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Bemetara
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
