Allowed

Manjeet Kaur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC8 Nov 2016MCRC/6238/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Sections 406 and 420 of the IPC regarding a cheating case involving a bounced cheque, the High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail, directing the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; applicant directed to be released on personal bond for Rs. 25,000 with one surety in the like sum.

Manjeet Kaur Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Chhattisgarh HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

MCRC No. 6238 of 2016

¶4

Manjeet Kaur W/o Harpreet Singh Aged About 48 Years R/o House No. 78 Sunder Nager, Vaishali Nager, Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh

¶5

---- Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Chhattisgarh Through : Station House Officer, Supela, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh

¶8

---- Respondent

¶9

For applicant - Shri Chandra Bhushan Kesharwani, Advocate. For Respondent/State – Shri Neeraj Jain, G.A.

¶10

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

¶11

Order

¶12

8/11/2016

¶13

The applicant has preferred this application for grant of bail as she is arrested in connection with Crime No.437/2016 registered in Police Station Supela, Bhilai for offence punishable under sections 406, 420 of IPC.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, a report was made by Yogita Banjare and Soniya Lahre that the present applicant shown herself to be coach for Rakbi in Dhanwantri School and collected Rs.2000/- from each student, thereafter for 2-3 days training was given and it was stopped. Subsequently, Rs.5000/- was taken from Yogita Banjare and Soniya Lahre and she took them to Bhuneshwar but no certificate was given. Thereafter, it was explained that Rs.35,000/- would be paid to student who had participated in the national and for which Rs.1000/- commission was to be given. Subsequently, amount was paid but eventually cheque which was given of Rs.35,000/- was bounced. Thereby, the applicant has committed fraud with the students.

¶15

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the report made was followed by Social Right Organization Kamlesh Dubey against whom

¶16

¶17

report was made earlier by the applicant. He further submits that charge sheet has been filed, false allegations have been levelled against the applicant, no further evidence is required, therefore the applicant may be released on bail.

¶18

Learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail.

¶19

Perused the case diary and the documents and the statement. Charge sheet in this case has been filed. Taking into nature of allegation and the facts involved in this case and the evidence appears to be documentary in nature. Taking into such fact, without further observation on the merits, this court is inclined to release the applicant on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant shall be released on her furnishing personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of concerned trial court for her regular appearance before it as and when directed.

Sd/-

(Goutam Bhaduri)

JUDGE

gouri

Manjeet Kaur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manjeet Kaur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishan Dewangan Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Rajendra Singh Arora Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Jayant Jaiswal Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Bhanu Kumar Ugre Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Dr. Krishnapratap Pandey Vs Shri Anil Mundra

Sanjay Joshi Vs State Of Chhattisgarh