Umashankar Shrivastava v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
In an application under Section 439 CrPC for regular bail, the High Court rejected the plea. Considering the nature and gravity of the offences, the manner of commission, and the applicant's criminal antecedents, the court was not inclined to release the applicant from custody.
What did the court decide?
Rejection of the application for grant of regular bail to the applicant.
What the court decided
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 4385 of 2016
- Umashankar Shrivastava S/o Durga Prasad Shrivastava Aged About 52 Years Caste Kayasth, R/o Amapara Ward, Police Station & Tahsil Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh.
- ---- Applicant (In jail)
Versus
- State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh.
---- Non- Applicant
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Applicant : Shri SK Mishra, Advocate For Non-applicant/State : Shri Vinod Tekam, PL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board
09.08.2016
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail given the gravity of the offence and his criminal background?
Whether the bail application should be allowed or rejected based on the facts and circumstances?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Umashankar Shrivastava
- respondent
State of Chhattisgarh
Coram
Goutam Bhaduri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- MCRC/4385/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court