Dismissed

Anshul Dubey @ Aakarsh Dubey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC7 Jul 2016MCRC/3286/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the first bail application filed for regular bail under Section 439 CrPC. The applicant was arrested for causing a stab injury during an altercation, punishable under Sections 307, 341, 34 IPC and Arms Act. The court declined bail due to the nature of the allegation and facts presented.

What did the court decide?

Bail application filed under Section 439 CrPC dismissed.

Anshul Dubey @ Aakarsh Dubey Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2016)

¶1

Page No.1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

M.CR.C. No. 3286 of 2016

¶5

Anshul Dubey @ Aakarsh Dubey, S/o. Gouri Shankar Dubey, aged about 21 years, R/o. Motinagar Boriya Road in front of Sharda Petrol Pump, Police Station : Tikrapara Raipur, District – Raipur (C.G.)

¶6

----Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Station House Officer, Police Station : Tikrapara, Raipur, District – Raipur (C.G.)

¶9

---- Respondent

¶10

For Applicant : Mr. Y.C. Sharma, Advocate For Respondent/State : Ms. Shobha Kashyap, Govt. Advocate

¶11

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

¶12

Order On Board

¶13

07/07/2016

¶14

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.53/2016, registered at Police Station – Tikrapara, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 307, 341, 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 25, 27 of the Arms Act.

¶15

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 04.02.2016 one Mohd. Nafiz and Abrar Ahamed were going on bike in order to see Mohd. Aniz, who had sustained injuries in earlier fight, when they reached near Tarun Bazar, chased by the applicant, Anshul Dubey and after overtaking the motor cycle, landed into altercation and Anshul

¶16

Page No.2

¶17

Dubey had stab the injured, Mohd. Nafiz at his back.

¶18

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there was no intention to kill the injured as only one stab injury was caused. He further submits that charge-sheet in this case has been filed and the applicant is in jail since 04.02.2016, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.

¶19

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application .

¶20

I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶21

Perused the case diary and statement of the victim. Perusal of the document shows that main allegation of assault is on the present applicant, who has caused the stab injury. Taking into the nature of allegation, facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to release the applicant on bail.

¶22

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is dismissed.

¶23

Sd/(Goutam Bhaduri) Judge

¶24

Balram

Anshul Dubey @ Aakarsh Dubey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anshul Dubey @ Aakarsh Dubey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrahas Yadav Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Dr. Neelkanth Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Ashish Trivedi Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Jaggu @ Jageshwer Chandraker Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Suresh Mishra Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Loknath Satnami Vs State Of Chhattisgarh