The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal filed by the M.P. Housing Board against an award enhancing land compensation. The court held that the lower court's award was just and proper after considering all relevant factors.
Appeal dismissed; the enhanced compensation award of the lower court stands affirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR F. A. No. 561 OF 2000
M.P. Housing Board, Through its Executive Engineer Shankar Nagar, Raipur (M.P.)
---- Appellant
Versus
For Appellant : Mr. Sanjay Patel, Advocate For Respondent No.2/State : Mr. Bhaskar Pyashi, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Sanjay Agrawal, J.
Judgment on Board
04/10/2016
dated 25.3.2000 under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter called as 'Act, 1894'), along with an application for condonation of delay of 18 days in filing the same.
2
The Land Acquisition Officer after considering the land of the owners had passed award on 5.8.1991 and awarded the amount of compensation at the rate of Rs.43,930/- per acre to each of the owners including the interest at the rate of 12% and 30% as arrears in the said award.
No order as to costs.
Sd/-
(Sanjay Agrawal) Judge
Tiwari
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the learned Sixth Upper District Judge erred in relying solely upon the sale deed produced by the respondent for fixation of compensation.
Whether the learned Court below erred in enhancing the amount of compensation.
4 provisions across 1 enactments
M.P. Housing Board
Biharilal
Sanjay Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
