Single judge dismissed a Cr.M.P. under Section 482 Cr.P.C. adding powers under Section 437(6) Cr.P.C. for bail in a cheating case. The court rejected the plea, noting four prosecution witnesses were examined, indicating the trial was not delayed.
The Cr.M.P. seeking bail and invoking Section 437(6) Cr.P.C. was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Cr.M.P. No. 666 of 2016
Rahul Bhutda S/o Sohanlal Bhutda Aged About 26 Years R/o Karhibhadar, Police Station Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Gurur, District Balod, Chhattisgarh.
…. Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Mr. Anupam Dubey, Dy. Governent Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
Order on Board
01.07.2016
-2-
arriving at the conclusion that there is no reason to believe that the trial is proceeding at a slow pace.
Sd/-
(P. Sam Koshy) Judge
KISHORE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present Cr.M.P. under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking bail under Section 437(6) Cr.P.C. invoking inherent powers deserves allowance given the prosecution has examined 4 witnesses out of 13 and
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Rahul Bhutda
State Of Chhattisgarh
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
