The High Court allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing Cr.M.P. No. 506/2016. Leave to appeal against the acquittal judgment was granted, and the matter was registered as an Acquittal Appeal for admission.
Leave to appeal against acquittal granted; case registered as Acquittal Appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
Cr.M.P. No. 506 of 2016
State of Chhattisgarh Versus Jeetkumar & Ors.
| 19.07.2016 Bhola |
Shri B. Gopa Kumar, Dy. A.G. for the petitioner/State. Heard on I.A. No.01/16, application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay occurred in filing of the Cr.M.P. On due consideration, I.A. No.01 is allowed and the delay in filing the instant Cr.M.P. is condoned. Also heard the present application filed under section 378 (3) of Cr.P.C. seeking for grant of leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 14.10.2015 passed in Criminal Case No. 942/2012. As arguable points have been raised by the State counsel particularly referring to Paragraph-8 of the impugned judgment, the application for leave to appeal is allowed. Leave as prayed for is granted. Let this Cr.M.P be registered as Acquittal Appeal and the matter be listed thereafter for admission. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge |
|---|
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the criminal special leave petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act should be condoned.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
State of Chhattisgarh
Jeetkumar & Ors.
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
