The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal as abated due to the death of the sole appellant without his legal representatives being brought on the record. No application was filed for substitution.
Appeal dismissed as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURTOFCHHATTISGARH,BILA$RDUR
(IRA No. 313 of 2006
———- Appeiiant
Versus
—«-- Regpondeht
ForAppellant: For Respondent:
Shri RS.Patel,Advocate Shri VA.Goverdhan,PanelLawyer.
Hon'bie Shrhhmticp:prifil’lkerDiwak’él‘ Hon‘ble $hri JugtigeR.C.S.Samant
J u alga me rat
i3 ritinker Diwaker,J
26H 0/20167‘
appellanthasexpired.
sameis dismissedasabated. . a, 1 ///\z/‘.//\z/‘. l
”‘//«
///\z/‘.//\z/‘.
/ Sd/j
s%t)
mos
Judge
Sdl, (Pr-irinkerDiwaker) Judge
restrain/—
Bode
State Of Chhattisgarh
Ritinkar Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
