The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a civil revision matter where the applicant sought a rent revision against the respondent. Finding that the parties had compromised the matter, the court allowed the revision based on the compromise agreement.
Civil revision disposed of in terms of the compromise entered into between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Civil Revision No. 97 of 201 6
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. V.K. Pandey, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
09/ 12/2016
Heard.
(1) Documents filed along with Covering Memo dated 07.12.2016 are taken on record.
(2) Counsel for the applicant submits that the rent has been revised with effect from 01.02.2011 to the extent of 25,500/- per month. ₹
(3) Counsel for the respondent submits that the matter has already
been compromised between the parties and only agreement has to be executed between them.
2
parties, the present civil revision stands disposed of in terms of compromise entered into between the parties.
(6) With the aforesaid observations, the civil revision stands finally disposed of.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
D/-
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Ambikapur
Smt. Rekha Agrawal
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
