The High Court condoned the delay in filing the revision petition and dismissed it, holding that there was no violation of the decree by the non-applicant and the concurrent findings of fact by lower courts preclude interference under Section 115 CPC.
Condonation of delay allowed; revision disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CR No. 53 of 2016
---- Applicants
Versus
---- Non-applicant
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicants : Shri Vishnu Koshta, Advocate For Non-applicant : Shri Vikram Singh, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order on Board
16/09/2016
C.R. No.53 of 2016
2
Sd/-
( Sanjay K. Agrawal ) JUDGE
Kvr
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the revision petition is to be condoned.
Whether the High Court can interfere with the concurrent findings of fact made by the trial and appellate Courts regarding the violation of the decree.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Balram Prasad Gupta
Saraswati Bai
Badan Bai
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
