The High Court dismissed the applicant's revision challenging a rejected Order 23 Rule 3 application. Finding the land was Government land, the court declined to entertain the revision and directed expedited trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CR No. 125 of 2016
Puranik Satnami S/o Late Bhukhan Satnami, Aged about 45 Years, R/o Village Kurra, Tahsil Abhanpur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) .................(Defendant No.1)
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Non-applicants
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : Shri C.R. Sahu , Advocate For Non-applicant/State : Smt. Astha Shukla, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order on Board
21/09/2016
( Sanjay K. Agrawal ) JUDGE
C.R. No.53 of 2016
2
Kvr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a revision under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC can be entertained when the trial court holds the suit land is Government land.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Puranik Satnami S/o Late Bhukhan Satnami
Smt. Lain Bai D/o Late Heera Lal
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
