Disposed

S.c. Shrivastava v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC3 Mar 2015WPS/682/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the High Court of Chhattisgarh addressed a claim regarding non-payment of retirement dues. The Court held that a High Power Review/Recruitment Committee had already been constituted to consider the petitioner's case. The petitioner was directed to file a representation to the Committee within 15 days, after which the Committee woul

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to file representation to High Power Review Committee within 15 days; Committee to decide and complete payment within six months.

S.c. Shrivastava Vs State Of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

¶3

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (St N0. 6^

¶4

PETITIONBR /S.C. Shrivastava, aged about 62 son of late Shri R. B. L. years, •^ $ Shrivastava, resident of HIG-3, Parijat ^ ^^^^ Extension, Nehru Nagar, P.S. Civil ^ Line, Civil and Revenue District ^'"s^-?13^^< Bilaspur (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDENTS:!. /State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of General Administrative, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur (C.G.) 2,. The Collector, ^ Janjgir,.._..-..District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) ^y. Deputy Director, office of Treasury Account and Pension, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶5

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

¶6

¶7

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARHAT BILASPUR

¶8

SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker

¶9

Writ Petition (S) No. 682 of 2015

PETITIONER

S.C.Shrivastava

VERSUS

State of Chhattisgarh & Others

¶15

RESPONDENTS

¶16

Shri Kamal Kishore Patel, counsel forthe petitioner. Shri Yashwant SingtiT.haktfsP.4 fpr the State.

CCtNSTITUTION OF

WRIT PETt

INDIA

^..^PDER , 3;@8.^815) ^^•^ With the consent.%$]$^FC^c@tS "%i;l$%GCS®i l^ for the parties, thff matter is

¶21

heard finally.

¶22

The present case non-payment of retiral dues in ^ K

¶23

particular pension to the petitiOFl^B,'?,! Counse] for the StateSBiyiftt ft;t,he State Government has already /<"•- //SiifeA constituted a hligh Power'Reyi'^l.^!|isS]C,c|rttnittee and the said Committee is duly empowered to consider'tRS8age8Ilf|e that of the petitioner,

¶24

¶25

Let the petitioner file 'a' represehtation to the said Committee or to make a request to the office of the Advocate General along with copy of the writ petition for forwarding the same to the Committee. Let this be done within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶26

On this being done, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and officers concerned within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order in accordance with law after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, be completed within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶27

With the above observations, this petition is disposed of. _-k..-—

¶28

-&""'

S.c. Shrivastava v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.c. Shrivastava v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Allem Khan Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Jeevan Rekha Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Pushpendra Diholiya Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Naresh Kumar Kant Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Ram Bharosa Sahu Vs The State Government Of C.g. And Ors.

Mukesh Kumar Soni Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.