Written petitioners sought regularization of service. Counsel for petitioners withdrew the plea and requested liberty to pursue administrative remedy. The court disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
Writ petition disposed of as not pressed with liberty to pursue remedy with State Government.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
W.P.(S) No. 6254 of 2007
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : Shri Vinay Pandey,Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri Garry Mukhopadhyay, Dy. Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
Order On Board
09/10/2015
Counsel for the petitioner submits that pending the present writ petition, the claim of the petitioner so far as regularization is concerned, has already been redressed and the only grievance which now remains is that the State Authority ought to have considered his regularization from an early date. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present writ petition at this juncture any further and prays for liberty to pursue his remedy with the State Government for an appropriate relief.
Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of as not pressed with the liberty as prayed for by the counsel for the petitioner.
Sd/- ( P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE
Bhola
Malik Ram Gabel
Tijram Sidar
State of Chhattisgarh
Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department
Collector, Raigarh
Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Kudekela
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
