High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or file representation within the prescribed time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 3220 of 2008
---- Petitioner
Versus
| ---- Respondents | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24/11/2015 Kamde |
None for the petitioner. Shri Utsav Mahishwar, Advocate appearing on behalf of Shri P.R. Patankar, counsel for the respondents/SBI. Even in the second call, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, the Court has no other option except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge |
Paulus Kujur S/O Late Shri Puran Prakash Kujur
State Bank Of India
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
