The High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur dismissed WPCR No. 70 of 2014 as infructuous. Petitioner's counsel submitted that the writ petition had lost its object, leading to its disposal without substantive adjudication.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPCR No. 70 of 2014
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
11/12/2015
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
Judge
(Prashant Kumar Mishra)
Shyna
Raghvendra Das Vaishnav
Rameshchandra Singh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
