The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a writ petition seeking quashment as infructuous because the petitioner was not included in the charge sheet following a report finding no role in the crime.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPCR No. 104 of 2012
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner : Shri Arvind Sinha, Advocate. For Respondent : Shri PK Bhaduri, Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
08/12/2015
Sd/-
Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra)
Barve
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking quashment of an order under Article 226 should be dismissed as infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Anita Kerketta
State Of Chhattisgarh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
