Disposal of multiple writ petitions where the Court found the causes of action infructuous due to reduction of premium/rent and demolition of structures, dismissing the petitions.
Petitions dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to move afresh if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
---- Petitioner Vs
---- Petitioner Vs
Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
---- Respondent
And
---- Petitioner
Vs
---- Respondent
And
---- Petitioner
Vs
---- Respondent
And
WPC No. 1021 Of 2015
---- Petitioner
Vs
---- Respondent
And
WPC No. 1167 Of 2015
---- Petitioner
Vs
---- Respondent
And
WPC No. 1560 Of 2015
---- Petitioner
Vs
---- Respondent
And
WPC No. 1557 Of 2015
Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Vs
| ---- Respondents | |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner | Shri Sunil Verma, Advocate |
| For Respondent/State | Shri Shashank Thakur, GA |
| For Respondent/Corporation | Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
01/12/2015
Sd/-
JUDGE
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Nirala
BALRAM RATHORE
RAJESH KUMAR AGRAWAL
KISHOR KUMAR PURUSHWANI
LAKHI RAM
ASHOK KUMAR AGRAWAL
PURUSHOTTAM DAS AGRAWAL
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
