Mastari Bibi and Ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to lapse of time.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to lapse of time.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 826 of 2008
Residents of Village Kanakpur, Post Chiniya, Police Station Ramanujganj, Tahsil Pal, District Surguja (C.G.)
---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur CG.
2. The Collector Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.)
3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.)
4. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Ramchandrapur (Ramanujganj), District Surguja (C.G.)
5. Village Panchayat Kanakpur, Through The Sarpanch, Janpad Panchayat Ramchandrapur, Tahsil Pal, District Surguja (C.G.)
6. Mohammed Ibrahim Son of Late Rahmat Hussain, Resident of Village Kanakpur, Post Chiniya, Police Station Ramanujganj, District Surguja (C.G.) --Respondents
For Petitioners: Shri V.K. Pandey Adv. For Respondents No. 1 & 2 Shri Adil Minhaj PL For Respondents No. 3 & 4 Shri A.S. Kachhwaha Adv. For Respondent No.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker
Order On Board By
06/07/2015
Counsel for the petitioners submits that by lapse of time this petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
(Pritinker Diwaker)
Judge
Jyotishi
Mastari Bibi & Others
State Of Chhattisgarh
Mohammed Ibrahim
Pritinker Diwaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court