The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed four review petitions challenging an order in a writ petition involving rice milling supplies. The court found no reason to entertain the applications as the petitioner had no role regarding the impugned order's specifics and the order was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Review Petition No. 59 of 2015
---- Applicants
Versus
Dwarkadas Rathi S/o Narayandas Rathi, 58 years, Partner, M/s. Mohan Rice Mill, Having its Office at Amaseoni, Vidhansabha Road, P.S. Vidhansabha, Post Amaseoni, Raipur, Tahsil and Revenue District Raipur (C.G.) (Res. No. 1 and 2 in the writ petition has not been made party to this review application as they are formal party and the list in the present review application is between applicants and non-applicant only) ---- Non-Applicant Review Petition No. 82 of 2015 1. C.G. State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Ltd. Through : Its Managing Director, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. The District Marketing Officer, C.G. State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, Nutan Kisan Rice Mill, Ram Sagar Para, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
| ---- Applicants |
|---|
Versus Harsa Rice Mills Pvt. Ltd. A Company registered under the Companies Act, through : Its managing Director namely Krishna Kumar Kejariwal S/o Late Shri Lal Kejriwal, Aged about 57 years, R/o Pandri Tarai Road, Raipur, P.S. & Post Devendra Nagar Civil and REvenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh company having its registered office at D-22, Sector-5 Devendra Nagar Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) (Res. No. 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7 in the writ petition has not been made party to this review application as they are formal party and the list in the present review application is between applicants and non-applicant only)
---- Non-Applicant
Review Petition No. 80 of 2015
---- Applicants
Versus
M/s. Manju Agro Pvt. Ltd. Raipur, A Private Limited Company registered under the Companies Act, having its office at Plot No. 1, Bhanpuri Industrial Area, Bhanpuri, Through its Director namely Shri Rajendra Daga S/o Late Shri Kanhaiyalal Daga, Aged about 59 years, R/o 43-Vivekanand Nagar, Raipur, P.S. and Post City Kotwali, Civil and Revenue District Raipur, (C.G.)
2
(Res. No. 1, 4 & 5 in the writ petition has not been made party to this review application as they are formal party and the list in the present review application is between applicants and non-applicant only)
---- Non-Applicant
Review Petition No. 83 of 2015
---- Applicants
Versus
Shri Dau Chawal Udyog Sirri, Kharora, Through: Its Proprietor Prahlad Kumar Pandey S/o Late D.R.Pandey, Aged about 46 years, R/o village Sirri, Tahsil Kharora, Raipur, P.S. & Post Raipur, Civil and Revenue District Raipur, (C.G.)
(Res. No. 1, 4 & 5 in the writ petition has not been made party to this review application as they are formal party and the list in the present review application is between applicants and non-applicant only)
---- Non-Applicant
For Petitioners : Shri Prafull N Bharat, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Navin Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
Order on Board
27/10/2015
and only dates may differ, they have been heard and are being disposed by a common order. The facts and dates shall be taken from Review Petition No. 59 of 2015.
only required to supply paddy to rice millers for milling. The milled rice from the paddy was then required by the millers to be supplied to the Food Corporation of India and the Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation within the time
3
required for the purpose. The submission therefore that the Petitioner had no objection to the extension of time was not applicable at all to the knowledge of the Respondents and was inadvertent.
Sd/Sd/-
(Navin Sinha) (P. Sam Koshy) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE
Amit
1 issue framed by the court
Whether review petitions should be entertained without showing any error apparent on the face of the record.
C.G. State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Ltd.
The District Marketing Officer
Navin Sinha
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
