HC issued anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to the applicant accused of cheating for allegedly suppressing his brother's name in a mutation affidavit. The court allowed bail noting the dispute was civil in nature.
Application for anticipatory bail allowed; applicant to be released on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety upon arrest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC(A) No. 1074 of 2015
Paduman Singh, son of late Shri Sukhsagar Singh Kashtriya, aged about 61 years, resident of village Akaltara, Tahsil & Thana Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh --- Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through the District Magistrate, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent
| For the applicant | : Mr. Arvind Shrivastava, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Deputy A.G. |
| For the Objector | : Mr. Pushkar Sinha, Advocate |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order on Board
05.11.2015
objector oppose the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Learned state Counsel submits that the applicant has submitted false affidavit wherein the name of Sharda Devi was ignored and consequently, she would be deprived of her right in the property of the father.
C.c. as per rules.
Sd/GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE
Rao
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted wherein the applicant is accused of suppressing a relative's name in an affidavit for property mutation.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Paduman Singh
State of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
