In FA No. 86 of 2008, the appellate bench dismissed the second First Appeal for want of prosecution after the appellants failed to appear in the second call despite a prior notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
FA No. 86 of 2008
----Appellants
Versus
Ranjit Singh Bindra S/O Shri Sardar Santosh Singh, aged about 43 years Businessman, R/O Raipur - Rohanipuram Mohalla, District - Raipur (C.G.)
---- Respondents
| 4/09/2015 | None for the appellants. The matter was passed over once in absence of any representation on behalf of the appellants. No one appears for the appellants even in the second call. In the circumstances, there is no other option left with the court but to dismiss the FA for want of prosecution. Accordingly, FA is dismissed for want of prosecution. |
|---|---|
| gouri | Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) JUDGE |
Rajesh Tikariya
Manoj Tikariya
Dr. K. L. Tikariya
Ranjit Singh Bindra
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
