Ahibaran Gond v. the State of C.G.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order on board dismisses the criminal revision as abated because the applicant had died on 30.1.2014.
What did the court decide?
Criminal revision dismissed as abated.
This order on board dismisses the criminal revision as abated because the applicant had died on 30.1.2014.
Criminal revision dismissed as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRR No. 399 of 2002
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Non-applicant
For Applicant: None appears of the applicant. For Non-applicant/State: Shri R.K. Mishra, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
07/08/2015
(1) Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant would submit that applicant – Ahibaran Gond has already died on 30.1.2014 and, as such, the revision has abated.
(2) Accepting the submission made by counsel for the applicant,
criminal revision is dismissed as abated.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
D/-
Ahibaran Gond
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court