In a criminal revision under Section 311 CrPC, the High Court dismissed the matter because the applicant failed to appear, make any representation, or seek an interim order, leaving the court with no option but to dismiss the revision.
The criminal revision was dismissed due to the applicant's default in appearing or offering representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Criminal Revision No.213 of 2011
Pankaj Mishra @ Bhalu, S/o Shri Anoop Kumar Mishra, aged about 19 years, R/o Type II, Single Storey, Q.No.536, Bacheli, Thana Bacheli, Distt. Dantewada (C.G.)
---- Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Police Station Bacheli, District Dantewada (C.G.)
---- Respondent
For Petitioner: None present.
For Respondent: Mr. O.P. Sahu, Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
01/10/2015
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Soma
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Pankaj Mishra @ Bhalu
State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
