This criminal appeal was dismissed because the appellant died during the pendency of proceedings. The court noted the absence of a substitution application by legal representatives, leading to the abatement of the appeal.
Appeal dismissed as abated in view of the death of the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Q9
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR N
CRA No. 2380 of 2000 ‘
Versus
---- Respondent
‘
EFor Appellant: Appellant: r None.
.
For Respondent:
u i‘ a: eiwraxa Shri Ashish Surana, Panel
‘
Order On Bnard
t
02/1 2/201 5
w a
7%EFor Appellant: Appellant: For Respondent:
Shri Ashish Surana, Panel Lawyer.
' ismW
“,i PritinkerDiwaker Judge
roshan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal should be allowed in view of the death of the appellant.
Shankar Satnami
The State of M.P. (now C.G.)
Dikar Judge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
