Disposed

Suresh Kumar Verma v. Shri a. K. Garg

Chhattisgarh HC3 Dec 2015CONT/526/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of four contempt petitions filed by un-employed individuals seeking employment against respondents from Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited. The court granted the respondents three months to decide the pending representations and allowed fresh applications upon expiry if no decision is taken.

What did the court decide?

Set 3 months time for contemnors to decide representations; liberty to file fresh applications if not decided.

Suresh Kumar Verma Vs Shri a. K. Garg — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2015)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

CONT No. 521 of 2015

¶4

Parmeshwar Kolhe S/o Late Shri Ramawtar, Aged About 23 Years Occupation Unemployed, R/o Sant Ravidas Marg, Jarhabhata Ward No. 7, P. S. Civil Line, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Shri A.K. Garg Manager ( H R D ) The Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Daganiya, Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶8

Shri S. R. Bandhey Deputy General Manager ( H R D ), The Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Daganiya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).......(Contemnors)

¶9

---- Respondents

¶10

And

¶11

CONT No. 528 Of 2015

¶12

Pramod Kumar Yadav S/o Late Shri Devi Prasad Yadav, Aged About 42 Years Occupation- Un-Employed, R/o Bitkula Paigwapara, PostSonthi, P.S.- Seepat, Civil & Revneue Distt.- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶13

---- Petitioner

¶14

¶15

Shri A. K. Garg Manager (H R D), The Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Daganiya, Raipur District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶16

Shri S.R.Bandhey, Deputy General Manager (H R D), The Chhattisgarh State Poser Holding Company Limited, Daganiya, Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh .........(Contemnors)

¶17

---- Respondents

¶18

And

¶19

CONT No. 526 Of 2015

¶20

Suresh Kumar Verma S/o Late Shri Shivkumar Verma, Aged About 38 Years Occupation- Un-Employed, R/o Village And Post- Kathiya, Thana- Kharouda, Tahsil- Tilda, Civil & Revenue Distt.- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶21

---- Petitioner

¶22

¶23

Shri A. K. Garg , Manager (H R D), The Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Daganiya, Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶24

Shri S. R. Bandhey, Deputy General Manager (H R D), The Chhattisgarh State Poser Holding Company Limited, Daganiya, Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh .........(Contemnors)

¶25

---- Respondent

¶26

And

¶27

CONT No. 525 Of 2015

¶28

Likeshwar Prasad S/o Late Shri Itwari Ram Sahu, Aged About 33 Years Occupation- Un-Employed, R/o Village And Post- Kathiya, Thana- Kharouda, Tahsil- Tilda, Civil & Revenue Distt.- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶29

---- Petitioner

¶30

¶31

Shri A. K. Garg , Manager (H R D), The Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Daganiya, Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶32

Shri S. R. Bandhey, Deputy General Manager (H R D), The Chhattisgarh State Poser Holding Company Limited, Daganiya, Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ..........(Contemnors)

¶33

---- Respondents

¶34

For Petitioners Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate For Respondents/contemnors Shri S. Majid Ali, Advocate on behalf of Shri A. S. Gaharwar, Advocate

¶35

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

¶36

Order On Board By

¶37

03/12/2015

¶38

Shri Majid Ali, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Shri Gaharwar, learned counsel for the contemnors, would submit that the matter is under active consideration of the competent authority, however, because of pendency of huge numbers of such applications, some more time will be needed for taking decision on the petitioners' representation. He would submit that if 3 months further time is allowed, the petitioners' representation shall be decided in accordance with law.

¶39

In view of the above, the contempt petitions are disposed of with liberty to the contemnors to decide the petitioners' representation in terms of the earlier order passed by this Court, in accordance with law, within a further period of 3 months.

¶40

If the matter is not decided within the above said period, the petitioners shall be at liberty to move afresh before this Court.

¶41

Sd/-

¶42

JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA

¶43

Nirala

Suresh Kumar Verma v. Shri a. K. Garg

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Kumar Verma v. Shri a. K. Garg

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prafull Patel Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Smt. Krishna Vijayvergiya, Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Tula Ram Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Lalit Kumar Singhania Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Kareliya Bai Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Pramod Kumar Yadav Vs Shri a. K. Garg