The High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, in a contempt case, observed that the petitioner failed to demonstrate contempt by the respondents against a prior order. Consequently, the court did not proceed further and dismissed the contempt petition.
Petitioner to file suitable writ application after orders passed by respondents before writ Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Contempt Case (C) No. 40 of 2014
N.B.Mitra S/o Late K.C. Mitra Aged About 62 Years Retired As Upper Division Teacher From St. Paul Higher Secondary School, Beran Bazar, Raipur, R/O E-50, Shailendra Nagar, P.S. Raipur, Tah. And Distt. Raipur C.G.
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
Shri Pawan Shriavastava, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rajeev Bharat, counsel for the respondents.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order On Board
01.12.2015
Reply to the instant contempt case has been filed on behalf of the respondents.
2. Heard both the parties for further proceedings as to whether any contempt is made out by the respondents in the light of order dated 26.02.2013 passed by the writ court in Writ Petition No.4097/98 (NB Mitra Vs. State of MP& Ors.) and order dated 08.4.2013 passed in MCC No.219/13. regarding correction of the original order.
3. In reply, it has been submitted that the respondents have considered and passed appropriate order in accordance with law on the merits of the matter.
4 . On due consideration and after perusal of the entire material available including the petition and reply to the contempt petition, in the
2
considered view of this Court, the petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the respondents have committed contempt against the order passed on 26.02.2013. With this, this Court is not inclined to proceed further in the matter.
5 . Consequently, contempt petition is dismissed, however the petitioner may file suitable writ application after the orders passed by the respondents before the writ Court, if he so advised.
Sd/(Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) JUDGE
Bini
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents committed contempt against the order passed on 26.02.2013.
Whether any further proceedings are required in the contempt case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
NB Mitra Vs. State of MP& Ors.Referred¶14
Writ Petition No.4097/98 (NB Mitra Vs. State of MP& Ors.)
MCC No.219/13Referred¶14
MCC No.219/13
N.B.Mitra
Smt. Shashi Bandhe
Anita Busat
Chandra Bhushan Bajpai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
