This bench held that the acquittal appeal was barred by limitation of 23 days as no application for condonation of delay with reasonable explanation was filed by the appellant.
The instant acquittal appeal is dismissed as barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
ACQA No. 106 of 2015
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondent
For appellants : None. For Respondent No.2/State : Mr. Roshan Dubey, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 1 : Not noticed.
Judgment
15/09/2015
2
acquired knowledge of the order of acquittal. Today also the appellant is not represented when the case is taken up for hearing.
Sd/-
Chandra Bhushan Bajpai
Judge
Pathak
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an acquittal appeal filed after 97 days from the date of judgment is barred by limitation.
Whether the period of limitation for appeal under Section 372 CrPC applies to a victim's appeal.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Smt. Ahilya Bai Satnami -v- State of Chhattisgarh and othersRelied on¶14
Acquittal Appeal No. 121/2015 (Smt. Ahilya Bai Satnami -v- State of Chhattisgarh and others)
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kannu Pasi
Rajesh Chandra Bhattacharji
State Of Chhattisgarh
Chandra Bhushan Bajpai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
