Petitioner sought direction to scrutinize his service case per a memo. State agreed to scrutinize as per the memo. Court found nothing survived for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
i e a
x—wwa‘
®
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WRIT PETITION (s) No. 4407OF2013 ?
PETITIONER
‘
“(5’\ 7
”
w)?
$aoow;3\c>
......
. . #‘yf'
KamTa NaTh Chaudhary S/o. Shri Shyamji Lal Chaudhar'y, aged abou’r 43 year's, R/o. Villge KodaTar‘ai, P.S. Bhupdevpur,’ DisTricT Raigar-h, Civil and Revenue DisTricT Raigar'h (CG)
Versus
N
REsPONDENTs
sme of Chhamsgarh, through the SecreTary, Scheduled CasTe and Scheduled Tribe Development Man’rmlaya, Police STaTion Rakhi, Tahsil Aar-ang, Naya Ralpur, DisTr-ic’r Raipur (CG)
Commissioner, DeparTmenT of Scheduled CasTe and Scheduled Tribe, P.S. Raipur, DisTricT Raipur (CG)
AssisTanT Commissioner, Tribal Welfare DeparTmenT, Raigarh, P.$. Raigarh, DisTricT Raigarh (CG)
‘Officer, Block EducaTion Block Gharghoda, P.S. Gharghoda, DisTricT Raigarh (C6)
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
9‘}
mam wm, may
“é“em wt 20
mm (W)
WumaW f§ém1 \ m$ m%m %a?mar&m SB : Hon’ble Shri Prasha_nLKumar Mishra, J. ’ 1-1—2014 Heard Ms. Indira Trip thi, Advocate for the petitioner and Shri Rakesh Jha, Govt. Advocat for the State. At the very outset, Iearned counsel appearing for the petitionerwouldsubmittha the petitioner does not press any other relief(s) and confine his pr yer to the extent that the respondents may be directed to scr inize the case of the petitioner in accordance with the instruc ions issued vide memo dated 7-3-2012. 'Learned counsel app aring for the State would submit that the case of the petitioner w ll be scrutinized in accordance with the prevailingmemodated7-3 012 and if he is found fit, appropriate order thereof for his contnuation of service will be passed in accordance with law. ln view of the above ubmission made by the learned State counsel, according to the le rned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication in t is writ petition. ‘ Accordingly, the writ p tition is disposed of.
Kamtq Nath Chaudhary
State of Chhattisgarh
Prashankumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
