Dismissed
Lochan Ram v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCWPS/1165/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
^ c^^'y^) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
^ c^^'y^) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^ f^.^i..^^" ^
c^^'y^)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
W.PJS)No. UiS /20m
PETITIONER:
/ Lochan Ram S/o Wamdev Gada Aged about 27 years R/o Village Dharnidhoda, Tahsil Gariyaband District Raipur (C.G.)
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS:
\0,.
/
^V.^M.}PM''.•'^\v
^y ^^^>--'
^y1 . ^.
^3.
/t
/ /6.
/7.
State of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary Panchayat and Social Welfare Department, D.K.S.Bhawan Raipur (C.G.) The Director (Panchayat) Panchayat and Social Welfare Directorate Raipur District Raipur (C.G.)
The Deputy Director (Panchayat) Panchayat and Social Welfare Directorate Raipur (C.G.) The Additional Collector Tahsil Gariyaband District Raipur (C.G.) The Sub Divisional Officer, Tahsil Gariyaband District Raipur (C.G.) The Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Dhamidhoda, Block Development Mainpur Tahsil Gariyaband District Raipur (C.G.) Dingeshwar S/o Dettu Raj Rawat R/o Village Dharnidhoda, Tahsil Gariyaband, District Raipur
(C.G.)
h2
II
'•^^•R -l't-.'
ii:
1?
'y
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OFLTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITfS) OR ORDERfs) OR
DIRECTIONS(S)
^.ecsEs^^
S'{/p^ "<br>^.r,.^ |
^-^^afeH^—78
n
3^^ •^llltfi'M, OTn'M'lfi, RlctKHy
,-0 ^.^.^...MKL tWRW W^^.....».......,.....>»..,.......-.................^Wf. 20
an^?T 'wa (ijpi^g^a)
sii^r ?>T ft-fii* chNic'i^Hi^Fi^ ^f "fe^ <ro«^.i<
gqi aii^i »i>vti ^siRmsn^T
S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prastiant Kumar Wlishra
16.07.2014.
None for the petitioner(s).
Shri Umakant Pandey, Pan^l Lawyerforthe State. .
The matter was passed over once absence of any
representation on behalf of the petitioner.
No one appears for the petif|ioner even in the second call.
In the circumstances, ther^ is no other option left with the Court
but to dismiss the writ petition forv< fant of prosecution.
The writ petition is dismissej y for want of prosecution.
Sd//-
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Judge
^
Ek.
Lochan Ram S/o Wamdev Gada
State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Panchayat and Social Welfare Department
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court