Allowed

Ashok Kumar Sur And Ors. v. The Raipur Development Authority

Chhattisgarh HC16 Jul 2014WPC/949/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Pettioners challenged acquisition under Article 226. Court directed respondents to consider final claim for compensation or plot in lieu of acquisition within three months from date of order to properly dispose of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Authority to consider and take final decision on payment of compensation or plot within three months.

Ashok Kumar Sur And Ors. Vs The Raipur Development… — Land Acquisition | Chhattisgarh HC (2014)

¶1

......... / 0k^wV

¶2

Smgla @amh

¶3

IN THE HIGH coURT OF JUDICATuRE AT BIL/551mg CM ‘f wgn PgTITION (C)^No. /2014

¶4

PETITIONERS

¶5

V‘J
”f
w g
¢V d w
\r\"<br>9A
“\é

¶6

1.”Xshok Kumar‘ Sur, son of LaTe Bhupendra Nn’rh Sur, aged about Zg years, residenf of Byron Bazar‘, Police STaTion KoTwali, Raipu‘” (CG)

¶7

{Dr Dilip Kumar Sur, son^of Lafe Bhupendr‘a Na‘rh Sur, aged abouT £3 years, residen‘r of near Ashir'wad Bhawan, Byron Bazar', Police $‘rafion Ko’rwaii, Raipur‘ (CG)

¶8

WgAjiT Kumar Sur‘, Lafe

¶9

Bhupendra NaTh Sur, aged abouf $3years, residenf of Byron Bazar, Police Slalion Kolwali, Raipur.

¶10

/, 4. SmT. Asha Das, daughler of La‘re Bhupendra Na’rh Sur, aged aboul‘ §§years, residen’r‘of Byron Bazar, Police S’ra‘rion Ko’rwali,

¶11

Raipur (CG)

¶12

Civil & Revenue DislricT Raipur.

¶13

¶14

¶15

The Raipur DevelopmenT REsPONDEN-r Aufhori‘ry, Through its Chief ExecuTive^{Officer,NayaRaipur‘.}

¶16

226/227^OFTHE WRIT^{PETITIONUNDERARTICLE} CONSTITUTION^OFINDIA

mmmmmmm

3%}:^31mm, WWW), Mg

“ea-51%;; WIT

em m (awmu)

¶21

mnfwim' wamm	3mm 21%:am:	i WWW ^fff"w% ^1i%r=::1€ $ aifaq ^arm:
	SB : Hon’ble ^{Shri Manindra”} 16—07-14	Kilohan ^{Shrivastava, J.}
Deep‘i \|Shri B;P.Sharma, ^coun Shri SUmesh ^{Bajaj, cm} This petition ^{has been} respondents to pay compl acquisition of petitioners’ l scheme. in the preliminary ^repi stated that till date, resp substantive ^{decision on the} be permitted ^{to finally decide} Taking into considera decision ^onpetitioners’ ^clai after hearing ^thepetitioners respondents in response td proper ^{to dispose of this pe‘} respondent / development the date ^{of receipt of copy o} The petition ^{is accordl}	sel for ^thepetitioner/s. insel for ^{the respondent.} filed by ^thepetitioners ^{for direction to} ansation and / or plot in lieu of and by the respondent under the (filed ^{by the respondent,} it has ^been 3ndents have not taken any final claim ^{of the}petitioners ^{and they may} the claim ^{of the}petitioners. ion ^{the aforesaid stand taken by the} claim of the petitioners, it would be ition at this ^{stage with direction to the} authority to consider and take final ^{m for payment of compensation or plot} within a period of three ^{months from} ^{f this order.} ^{ngly finally disposed off.}

Ashok Kumar Sur And Ors. v. The Raipur Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Kumar Sur And Ors. v. The Raipur Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Budhia Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Sanjay Singh Vs Regional Transport Authority and Anr.

Dilesh Kumar Chandrakar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Ashok Kumar Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

M/S Sardar Pharmaceutical Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Sayyad Anwar Ali Vs Regional Trasport Authority