Raman Bihari Kannoje v. Regional Transport Authority
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.) .‘... w.P.(C) No. Kw? of 2014
PETITIONER
(Eman Bihari Kannoje, aged abou’r 49 years, S/o Late R.K.Kannoje, R/o Shyam Nagar', Polsay Par-a I P.S. CiTy Ko‘rwali Disf’r. Dur‘g (C.G.)
VERSUS
RESPONDENT
‘/Regional Transpom‘ Au’rhorify, Raipur Dis’r’r. Raipur (C.6.)
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
\M
3a aw.“mm? famw
rmw gm” VQCyvgJZ‘Gg)“”#111 20
mm(W)
| MWW a?“ W |
I mww‘a lama? fzfaWen ’ a; aim am |
|
|---|---|---|
| Nikki! | : a Shri Santdeh Guete, Su Shn' Dhannaah Shrivas change Qf timing §n reguiar H directinn may bE isguad t0 expeditidusiy $tate ceuneei has n0 t to ihe respdndent. The preeent petiiidn is reependent to decide the pe 13l05/2G‘i4 it already not preferabiy within a period of eepy 9f this cinder. Limited grievance of t i»‘ |
ing aided, applicaiicn as expeditieusiy 9f the petitiener as peesihie dated Sd/— Manindra Mohan Shrivastava A Judge nset ferthe petitienet. ava, Pane! Lawyerfarthe $tat8. petitianer is that tha appiicaiian for ermit i§ pending since 13105/2014 am: the respondent t0 decide the same bjeciion if any such direetien i3 issued accerdingiy diepesed eff dimming the ane month from the date ef receipt 0f e |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPC/1268/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court