The High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging the reinstatement of a respondent terminated without complying with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Writ petition dismissed; liberty reserved to petitioners for appropriate steps.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^^c£)
i
.A'^ .}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ^O'^S' / WRIT PETITION N0. /2005 PETITIONER 1. State of Chhattisgarh (S) Through Secretary Water Resources Department Mantralay Bhawan Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2.. Executive Engineer Water Resources Division ^^ Balaoda Bazar ./ /^. <A^t\ /Jt* /^ Raipur, Chhattisgarh .>%/ ^w ^4K^y Sub Divisional o-f-pree^ ^^ ^...'^•"'0>'V Water Resources Subdivision _< f.^"/ ^/y Kasdol Distt.Raipur, Chhattisgarh VERSUS RESPONDENT(S) 1., TulaRam S/o Kartik Ram Patel R/o Village & Post Hatod Thana - Kasdol Distt.Raipur, Chhattisgarh
©
| 2. | Presiding Officer | |
|---|---|---|
| Industrial Court | ||
| Raipur(C.G.) | ||
| /3. | Presiding Officer | |
| LabourCourt | ||
| Raipur(C.G.) | ||
| APPyCATION UNDER | ARTICLE 227 OF | |
| ^ | THE CONSTITUTIO | N OF INDIA |
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
W.P. No. 4025 of 2005
PETITIONERS
State of Chhattisgarh and others
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
Tularam and others
(WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION
OF INDIA)
(SB: Hon'ble Mr. N.K. Aaarwal. J.l
Present: Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No.1.
ORAL ORDER
(Passedon03.04.2014)
®
Labour Court, the respondent No.1 has been reinstated by the petitioners.
balram
Sd/N. K. Agarwal Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order by the Industrial Court affirming reinstatement without complying with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 suffers from jurisdictional illegality.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
State of Chhattisgarh
Tularam
N. K. Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
