Second appeal under Section 100 CPC dismissed because the appeal was withdrawn by the appellants after hearing, with liberty reserved to seek further relief.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to take appropriate steps under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
c/%$)V
m THE HIGH COURT OF CI-H-IATTISGARH AT BILASPUR.>
S.A. No. 3 ('{é
£2004
3mm Baruch
APPELLANTS : Tholma s/o Johan, aged about
’PLAINTIFFS /1.
f 56 years.
Anjlus s/o Johan, aged about
50 years.
Both r/c village Galonda, Tehsil
& District Jashpur, C.G.
VERSU S
RESPONDENTS : $.1ganram s/o Handuram, aged
DEFENDANTS' /’ about 40 years, Caste-Munda,
f, r/o village gxakardega,
Tehsil & Distt. Jashpur, c.G.
The state of mhattisgarh,
through Collector, Jashpur,
District Jashpur, C.G.
/
XX SECOND APPEAL WDER SECTION 10Dv/eOF THE CODE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE.
f:
.i m»
HIGHCOURTOFCHHATTISGARH.BILASPUR
SecgngAggea!No.346of2004
APPELLANTS!:
(Plaintiffs)
Versus
RESPONDENTS/: (Defendants)
{SecondappealunderSection100oftheCodeofCivilProcedure}
Present:
Mr.A.K.Prasad‘counselfortheappellants.
SindleBench:Hon’bleMr.T.P.Sharmad
ORDER
(9-9-2014)
J/I/I/
Sdl-
T.P. SHARMA
Judge
Tholma s/o Johan
Anllus s/o Johan
Suganram s/o Handuram
The State of Chhattisgarh
T.P. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
