Hilariyus and Ors. v. Thomas and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment discusses the interpretation of Order 41 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the discharge of an appeal under Rule 11 of the CPC. The single judge bench of Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal analyzed the procedural steps courts must follow when dealing with appeals from judgments that need reconsideration.
What the court decided
.WWLMWM;NWWV aoaaaaanocna nooououo conawraaoao wwauannoaonooaua )nv AT B ILASPUR . §gcond Appeal No. 3461 /2001. Wgilariyus EM s/o Karlus, age-d about 40 years, \g2 Ranjeet s/o Karlus. aged about 30 years. Both caste Uraon, occupatiorr Agriculture & Service, r/o village Bhitdhara; TehsilBagicha , Distt . Jashpurnagar ', C, G. (LRs . of Plaintiff) VERSUS. \aK/‘I‘homas s/o Patras , aged about 35 years, r/o village Kunkuri, Tehsil Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur,C.G. wi’ntE . Sushila(DFD. N0.1)wd o Henry, age 28 ‘ ' years. “If” VBW‘bibiya gulab s/o Henry, aged about 18 years vawDeepak Toppo s/o Henry, age d about 1 2 years. WfLenin Toppo s/o Henry, a ged about 8 years. WLeena Teppo d/o Henry, aged about 6 years. Minors Deepak. Lenin and Leena through their mother & natural guardian reSpondent no. 2.A.
APPELLANTS $’LAINTIFF EM
l ‘ ‘ > ‘ ‘ i ‘ ‘ \ \ I V i REspoNDEN'I-S DgFENDANrs: } l i i
All caste Uraon, r/o village ,Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpur , C. G.. 'Defendent (LRS . of No. 2) wgwémrit s/o Barnabas, age {60 r/o village Kunkuri, Tehsil years,Kunf‘ kuri. Distt. Jashpurnagar , C. G. (DFD. No. 3) ‘Jubel s/o Laloo, age village Kunkuri, Tehsil4’2 Kunk’uri,years, r/Q Distt. Jashpurnag‘ar, ‘ ' C. G. (gab. No. 4) V. cont‘d . 2
-2-
\“54" L ampanduis s/o Premchand, age 50 years, r/o village Jamchuan, Tehsil Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpurnagar, C. G.
(DFD. NQ.5)
Piyush Toppo s/o Yakub, age 55 years, r/o village Kunkuri, Tehsil Kunkuri, Distt. Jashpurnagar, C.G.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court was justified in appealing to the Supreme Court for reversal due to a legal mistake.
Whether Rules 1 and 2 of Order 41 CPC regarding discharge of an appeal must be strictly followed before dismissal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
W]
- respondent
Thomas s/o Patras
Coram
Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- SA/346/2001
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court