Dismissed

Laxmi Narayan Agrawal v. Smt.Ramtullah and Others

Chhattisgarh HC1 Sept 2014SA/331/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a second appeal against a judgment and decree dismissing a suit for possession of property where the trial court held the appellant had failed to prove ownership. The lower appellate court also dismissed the appeal on similar grounds.

What did the court decide?

Maintained the lower court's dismissal of the suit and the judgment and decree passed against the appellants.

Laxmi Narayan Agrawal Vs Smt.Ramtullah and Others — Partition | Chhattisgarh HC (2014)

¶1

¶2

M w f / T ?

¶3

B E E O R E . - T H E R O N ' B L E H I Q ‘ R C O U R T J U D I C A T U R E , B I L A S P U R ( C . G o )

¶4

S i n g l e^Bennh

¶5

\ s x / i N O $ 3 ! / & 4 »
J v X ’ ? -
' 7 4
{ / L a m i n a r a y a n A g r a w a l , A g e d Y e a r - s ,
s / o L a t e $ h r i 3 K a n h a i l V a i 1 E g r a w a 1 .
R e s i d e n t o f B a n i a P a r a . D u r g ( C .G .)
. 1 . . . / £ w p e 1 1 a n t
V E R § W $
1 . s m t . R a m t u l l a h w / o H i r a m a n . A g e d 5 0 y e a r s .
/ V i l l a g e P i s e g a o n , P q s t P i s e g a ' o n .
T a n s : D i s t t : B u r g .
f2f , . MS a/ no s a$ a rs/j oo o S oa £r j ov oi ,l l aa gg ee d P i4 so e gy ae oa nr ;s ,
’ P a m :
. P i s e g a o n , T a h & , D i s t t : D u n g .
. . ~ 3 ; A n k a l p e 8 / 0 B i s a h u , A g e d 4 5 y e a r s }
.f ‘ . . V i l l a g e s P i s e g a a n T a & 3 1 . 5 % : m u g .
\ § , ¥ ‘' 1 '‘ 2 ?
s t a t e o f C h h a t t i s q a r h ,
. t ' \ ' l ‘ y f
‘ : \ r T h r o u g h C o l l e c t a r , D u r g . ‘
. . g 5 . . . ; i R e s p p n d e x l t ( J i g f t s )
/

¶6

/ @

¶7

? M g

¶8

B E F G R E , T I E H O N ‘ B L E H i G i - I C O U R T J U D I g f x g ‘ U R E , B I L A 5 P U R C C ,^G.)

¶9

$ § n g i e l^Bench 5 % N O 3 / 5 ! / a 4 £

¶10

S m t N i r m a l a A g r a w a l , W / o L a m L a x m i n a l a y a n A g r a w a l , A g e d a b o u t 7 7 y € a r s

¶11

b . V i v e k K u m a r A g r a w a l , S / O L a t e L a x m i n a r a y a n A g r a w a l , A g e d a b o u t 5 1 y e a r s

¶12

S m t . M a m t a R a m o r i y a , w / o S h i s h i r R a m o r i y a , A g e d a b O u t 5 8 y e a r s

¶13

S m t . M a n i s h a A g r a w a l , W / o D e e p a k K u m a r A g r a w a l , A g e d a b a u t 5 9 y e a r s A l l a r e r e s i d e n t o f : B a n i y a P a r a , I n F r o n t o f T r i p t i S a d a n , P o l i c e S t a ‘ i j o n a n d ; D i s t r i c t D u r g , C G

¶14

“ 1 n ,

¶15

H I G H C O U R T O F C H H A T T I S G A R H . B I L A S P U R

¶16

¶17

S e c o n d A g g e a l N o . 3 3 1 o f - 2 0 0 4 A P P E L L A N T S : L a x m i n a r a y a n A g r a w a l ( D e a d ) t h r o u g h L R s 1 a . S m t . N i r m a l a A g r a w a l b . V i v e k K u m a r A g r a w a l c . S m t . M a m t a R a m o r i y a d . S m t . M a n i s h a A g r a w a l V e r s u s R E S P O N D E N T S : 1 . S m t . R a m t u l l a h 2 . M a n s a 4 . S t a t e o f C h h a t t i s g a r h ( D e f e n d a n t s ) { A p p e a l u n d e r S e c t i o n 1 0 0 o f t h e C o d e o f C i v i l P r o c e d u r e }

¶18

P r e s e n t :

¶19

M r . N S . D h u r a n d h a r , c o u n s e l f o r t h e a p p e l l a n t s . N o n e p r e s e n t f o r r e s p o n d e n t s N o . 1 , 2 a n d 3 . M r . $ u m l t J h a n w a r , P a n e l L a w y e r f o r t h e S t a t e / r e s p o n d e n t N o . 4 .

¶20

S i n g l e B e n c h : H o n ’ b l e M r . T . P . S h a r m a , J

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

( 1 - 9 - 2 0 1 4 )

¶23

. T h i s i s s e c o n d a p p e a l a g a i n s t t h e j u d g m e n t a n d d e c r e e d a t e d 2 4 - 2 - 2 0 0 4 p a s s e d b y t h e 7 m A d d i t i o n a l D i s t r i c t J u d g e ( F a s t T r a c k C o u r t ) , D u r g i n C i v i l A p p e a l N o . 3 - A / 2 0 0 4 , a f f i r m i n g t h e j u d g m e n t a n d d e c r e e d a t e d 1 7 - 1 2 - 2 0 0 2 p a s s e d b y t h e 3 m C i v i l J u d g e C l a s s - l , D u r g i n C i v i l S u i t N o . 6 0 - A / 2 0 0 2 .

¶24

2 . A s p e r p l a i n t a l l e g a t i o n , t h e p l a i n t i f f h a s f i l e d s u i t f o r p o s s e s s i o n o f K h a s r a N o . 5 7 3 / 1 , a r e a 0 . 1 6 a c r e , s i t u a t e a t V i l l a g e P i s e g a o n u p o n w h i c h t h e d e f e n d a n t s h a v e c o n s t r u c t e d h o u s e . T h e d e f e n d a n t s h a v e d e n i e d t h e a d v e r s e a l l e g a t i o n a n d h a v e c l a i m e d o w n e r s h i p . A f t e r p r o v i d i n g o p p o r t u n i t y o f h e a r i n g , t h e t r i a l C o u r t h a s d i s m i s s e d t h e s u i t a n d t h e a p p e l l a t e C o u r t h a s d i s m i s s e d t h e a p p e a l o n t h e g r o u n d t h a t t h e a p p e l l a n t / p l a i n t i f f h a s f a i l e d t o p r o v e o w n e r s h i p o v e r t h e s u i t p r o p e r t y .

¶25

3 . f h a v e h e a r d l e a r n e d c o u n s

¶26

j u d g m e n t s o f t h e C o u r t s b e !

¶27

¶28

P a g e 2 o f 2 S . A ‘ N o . 3 3 1 / 2 0 0 4

Laxmi Narayan Agrawal v. Smt.Ramtullah and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Laxmi Narayan Agrawal v. Smt.Ramtullah and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tirath Ram and Ors. Vs State of C.G.and Ors.

Banshram and One Vs Dineshwar and Ors.

Gautam Lal Agrawal and Another Vs Angira Kumar Agrawal and Others

Jaynandan Singh and Ors. Vs Shailendra Singh and Ors.

Kadhu Vs Smt. Indira Kunwar and Ors.

Dukhu Ram Gupta Vs Shrimati Abhiman Bai and Others