This single bench order dismisses a second appeal filed by Derha Ram Thakur for want of prosecution as he failed to appear or make representation during two hearings. No order as to costs.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
f'^. IN THE HinHCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT B(LASPUR - CHHATTIS^ARH
^
S.A. N0.: •aog 72004
^^^ .'-^^A c^'^&t.^' A^J?;£I-L,A'N^' p-^^ '3SL ,e»B" ?^ ....-•' PLAINTITF
/ DERHA RAM THAKUR S/6. PremSingh Thakur Ex-Sarpanch, GramPanchayat-Jewartala, R/o. Barbaspur, TahsU - Guhderdehi, Distt.: Durg (Chhattisgarh) •
i-.?a5^>^?^o-*^A-'.^^w^?< >^^^
VEI^US
DEFENDANTS: ^RESPONDENTS 1 /(1)STATEOFCHHATT[SGARH' ! Throu^ltfaeCoUectQr-Durg
,(2) SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFIGBR, / Village Enguieering Services, Durg
?) BLOCKDEVELOPMENTOFFICER Block—Gunderdehi, Distt;: Durg (Clihattisgarh)
'4)TAHSILDAR,
G1mderdehi»Distt.:Duig(ClAattisgaFh)
irmnnr,lA KAl6:^»DE^SE<BTION
c
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR
SINGLE BENCH
HON'BLE MR.T.P. SHARMA. J
S. A. No. 208 of 2004
Appellant
Derha Ram Thakur
versus
Respondent 1. Stafe of Chhattisgarh and others.
Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 1908
Appearance:
None for the appellant.
Mr. Roshan Dubey, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.1. None for rest.
ORDER
(03.09.2014)
Vijay
Sd/-
T. P. Sharma Judge
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Derha Ram Thakur
State of Chhattisgarh
Sub-Divisional Officer
Block Development Officer
Tahsildar
T.P. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
