Allowed

Mahadev Dhruve v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC5 Feb 2014MCC/410/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed the application for condonation of delay and restoration of the dismissed Writ Petition (Special) No. 3858 of 2005, which had been previously dismissed by peremptory order. The W.P. was restored to its original number and set to be heard in the case of the State of Chhattisgarh, the State of Madhya Pradesh, and other respondents.

What did the court decide?

Allowed the M.C.C. application, condoned the delay, and restored W.P.(S) No. 3858 of 2005 to its original number.

Mahadev Dhruve Vs State Of Chhattisgarh… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2014)

¶1

:-f .\°

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶3

-4-f-o M.CC N0. / 2013

¶4

(An apDlication for restoration of W.P.fSI No. 3858 OF 20051

IN THE MATTER OF:-

APPLICANT T

PETITIONER

^l^lahadv Dhruve, S/o B.R. Dhruve, Aged about 36 years, Working as Sub Divisional Officer (Agriculture), Sub Division ad . District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

Versus

¶10

RESPONDENTS:

¶11

RESPONDENTS: :^'l'; State of Chhattisgarh, through - the Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Building, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ...•^".^.••''^l^'-''"" 2. Jhe State of Madhya Pradesh, ••""^.^'^^•V^"* ^ through the Secretary Department of of Agriculture, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, M.P. ^^T'-The Director (Agriculture), Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal, M.P. Director ,^4f'The (Agriculture) Chhattisgarh, Raipur, (C.G.). »r'Shri Chandranath Singh, Deputy Director (Agriculture) Janjgir, District - Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

¶12

PUCATIQN FOR

¶13

^ TI ON OF W.P.fSI No.

¶14

-TI'^lQ—•""*-!'1-I'»"'^—nt»->«•.

¶15

1 x
1.1... "'^ _^/ ^ jfy
«)V
.V
\®

¶16

3^^ •^i-'ii^ii, ^Tfly'id, teroy

¶17

•WRW ^^••••••^•^-^-•••^--^—••--^—.....y.:.c:.c^.!PCs.-.:ij;.i..c'f^.... ^^

¶18

3n^?i vw (^S-y'ssi)

¶19

anS^i.^i R-ti'b WT 3IWCT *11«(>	?^ITWHftiI Sll^t	^Ncrihinirai•&'fgi^^fe^; '^'siRnsn^i
	S.B.: HON'BLEJUSTICE MR. PR 05.02.2014	llTINKER DIWAKER
	Shri Ravi Bhagat, counselfor Shri Kunal Das, PLforthe Sts Heard on I.A. No.01, applk in filing the M.C.C. This is notopposed by coui For the reasons mentionedl allowed. The delay in filing the M.i Also heard on M.C.C. No. for restoration ofW.P.(S) No. 385( this court vide order dated 31.07.: For the reasons mentionedt allowed. Accordingly, M.C.C. No.41
	No. 3858/2005 is restored to its a

¶20

5Tw^-i<j ^ia ^s-jnwr. <i<4^«m?—FS/43—1/2012—l,50,0t)0.

¶21

Mahadev Dhruve v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahadev Dhruve v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Kumar Tamrakar Vs Smt. Dhaneshwari Bai Sinha and Ors.

Prem Kumar Megi Vs Satish Sankhala

The New India Ass.Co.Ltd.Bilaspur Vs Smt. Sam Bai and Others

Balsingh and Ors. Vs Lalit Kumar Sinha and Anr.

Pradeeep Enmanual Robinson Vs Addl. Superintending Engineer and Ors.

Jitendra Kumar Sahu Vs Dharam Prakash Tiwari and Ors.