ascertained as Rs.10,130/-. The Tribunal has not awarded any amount towards promotional prospects of the deceased, who was in permanent government job.Therefore,consideringthenatureof job and age of the deceased, in view of law laid down in Sar/a Verma (Smt.) and others Vs Delhi Transport Corporation and another, (2009) 6 SCC 121, 30% of monthly income is to be added to the monthly income of the deceased, which comes to Rs.3,039/-. After adding 30%, the monthly income of the deceased would be 13,169/i.e. Rs.1,58,028/-. Considering the number of claimants i.e. two, in view of taw laid down in Sar/a Verma (Supra), 1/3rd (Rs.52,676/-) is required to be deducted towards personal and living expenses of the deceased and having deducted thus the annual loss of dependency comes to Rs.1,05,352/-. Since the deceased was 46 years of age, multiplier of 13 would be applicable and after applying this multiplier, the total loss of dependency comes to Rs.13,69,576/-.,Under the conventional heads, the Tribunal has awarded a meager^mount of Rs.14,000/- and therefore, considering t,he age of the claimants, the fact that in the accident they have lost both their mother and father, award of Rs.75,000/- in lump sum under the conventional heads would meet the ends ofjustice. It is awarded accordingly.
