High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal under Section 30(1(a) of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
a
B
-'3
iivssion
iNHlGHCOLiRT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH, ATBILASPUR
nivt" ^"r"n
INTHEMATTEROF MISC. APPEAL N0.
|1 1(6 OF 2004
l.AVINASH SINHAL,
S/0 GAURI SHANKAR SINHAL,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, .
R/0 CQLLEGE RQAD, THANA-TEHSIL
& DISTRICT. MAHASAMUND (C.G.)
APPELLANT AGRIEVED PARTY
vs.
/ x ABOUT 7 YEAR, LATE BHARAT LAL CHANDRAKAR
^^/.^'
<"\y'
RESFONDENTS 1-3/ APPLICANTS
RESPONDENTS/ COURT
RESPONDENTS/NONAPPLICANT N0.1
RESPONDENTS/NONAPPLICANT N0.2
RESPONDENT/STATE
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 30 l(a\ OF THE WORKMEN COMPENSATION ACT 1923 (8 of 23)
E—3i
•XI-H€—78
3SET •^wifft'if, Brfl+f'is, Ricil^y
. . M R No. l-1-1(9/ 6<
'a^ ^^ •WfplT *t4tch""""""""""""""""""""""'^""'""WI. 20
l:'.v '•^a'
sii^?r wra? C^if^s^T)
3T[^I^T ft-li'h ^iFiferih'wi?if'?.fes> <r<ii(ii<
?Tsn 3TT^?T sft<iict) ^giw^gsii^t ^aifiiHan^i
I.B-: HON'BLESHRI PRITINkER DiWA.KER,J.
86.S2.2S14
None appears for the^ annellant. even in the second
round.
In wew of the above, tiijs Court is left vnft no other ontion
but to dlsiriss fte appeal for w^nt ofprosecution.
Accordingly, the app^al is dismissed for vrant of
prosecution.
Sd/'-
Pritinker Diwaker
Judge
Aiui
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Avinash Sinal & Ors.
Bhushna Chandrahar
Saghar Chandraak
Poonam Chandrahar
Commissioner Workmen
Gaurai Steel Industries
Pritinker Diwaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
