The first appeal filed by the appellant against a divorce decree under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear after being called in the second round.
The first appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
. “w
r‘Kr "’ ii,
”Wiluyonouyummn
CF 045745
............. , L
HIGH COURT OF JUDIWUREOF IV§.P. AT JABALPUR
@HE
First Appeal No. BIB /2ooo
APPELIANT : gangadhar Rao Jadhav SO/ Daulat Rae Jadhav
V
§/\ aged about 47 years, Clerk, Orimtal Fire
and General In“ _ Dace Company Burg,
’l‘eh.
& Distt. DURG
VS.
RESPmDENTJ—smt. Ashalata Jadhav w/o Shri Gangadhar Rae aged about 42 years, D/O Shri Laxman Shankar Ghatge R/O Tatyapara, Raipur Teh. & Distt. RAIPUR.
D/O Shri Laxman Shankar Ghatge R/O Tatyapara, Raipur Teh. & Distt. m\m‘‘‘.‘J77 /} APPE ALWmUNDER $ECTICN 28 OE m3 HINDU MARRIAGE ACT
W
WW, m, W
W 2m
m ma (W)
mwm \Im'aww1im§mr
awifmavé‘a
S B ' HON’BLE JUSTICE MR PRITINKER DIWAKER
10.02.2014
None for the appellant(s).
Shri PankajAgrawa!, counsel fo the respondents.
Even after the matter was call d in the second round, none
g appeared for the appellant(s), therefor , in these circumstances, this
Court has no other option but to ismiss the case for want of
. prosecution.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismi sed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
Pritinker Diwaker
Judge
"<br>ii
Gangadhar Rao Jadhav / Daulat Rae Jadhav
Ashalata Jadhav
Pritinker Diwaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
