The High Court at Bilaspur, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., granted a further extension of 45 days to the petitioner to deposit a fine amount ordered in a previous criminal revision, as the impugned order had stalled the disposal.
Granted further extension of 45 days for depositing the fine amount; criminal revision disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF_CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SfNGLE BB4CH
CRMPNo.f"^ 7/2014.
PETITIONER Jaihind, S/o Chaitar Jaiswal,
REVISIONER Aged about 34 years, Resident of
[Jiehind Dena Bank, Kliarsipara,
^^•^^ ..—"• Bhilai, District Durg,
.»-—
Chhattisgarh.
^^g
VERSUS
RESPONDENT State of Chhattisgarh, ThroLigii
-
Police Station Chliavvani,
District - Durg, Chhattisgarh.
^^yT^^lt^^J ("AOT? A^^> - (O^/Z^f^]
A PETITION UNDER SECTION_482/OF Cr.P.C. SEEKJNG EXTENTION OF TIME FOR DEPQSmQN OF FINE AMOUNT AS PER ORDER DATED 1 1/04/2fft4, _PASSED. IN CRR N0. 531/2003. It is most humbly and respectfully submitted on behalf ol" tlie accused (hereafter petitioner) that; petitioner in the instant case is aggrieved by the order dated 11.04/2014 passed by Hon'ble High Court in CRR N0. 531 of 200?, against the present petitioner/accused.
i^^^:^ '• • fsss'xtss^?•;>.;;•i;;; ;^'
^ A-1.
XI-HC—78
^EE? 1BTrai?PT, iSrflwi^, Rlciwy
y^ '•'!/'^' f-^^f 1&2_^ fllHpfT ?i»tW. t>:
sn^ Siq'W
| sn^^iiR'ii'fc WnSII^IOTHi |
S^aTW^fsasn^ | ^)<<Fp1^fflltipfl'^f^t<J)<f^f^dl< ^iSiff^IIW^I |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | S.B: Hon'bleJustice Shri P.Sam 1.12.2014 Shri Ravi Kumar Bhagat, cou By way of the instant petitic petitioner has sought for further ex fine amount imposed by this Court <br>Criminal RevisionNo.531/2003. Crimi.nal Revision No.531/2 11.4.14 whereby the judgment a sentence dated 30.10.03 passed t Durg in CriminalAppeal No.16p/20 vide order dated 11.4.14, this Cour the petitioner for the offence pur However, the sentence part was undergoneand in lieu thereof, fin was to be deposited bythe petition 11.4.2014. Through the present.petitie further time for depositing the saic respectofthe disposal ofthe Crim at a belated stage and th.erefore, l amount, the period had already lap further extension oftime. This request of the petitior counsel. |
Koshv |
3 T'<41tl!<?l<<, OTtl'tt'l?, Rldl'U'y flTOcfT aiW wN..^B^.J0.2.^.(.......^2oity T-
3ii^[ira% ('jpTgit'ty)
| an^rwIS'ii* <OTS))^T3fflra |
SBniiR^flagiiSg | c. •^i^^fi't•tti^^T'^is^'(.KI^K Si^if^naiii^ ; |
|---|---|---|
| .Saalae'...: ..4- •;-^->'L'. , f.-''.' --,•••,. |
Considering the facts and circu is of opinion that it is a fit case wher •furthei-Rei!'i6cl;bf45clays in depositjns CburfinCTmifial Revision No.531 of3 . , ,„.Wjth th&aboveobseryation, th^ |
tnstances ^ 003 pfthe case, this Court the petitioner can be granted the amouht as ordered by this dated 11.4.14. CrM.Pstandsdispcised of. Sd/- P.SamKoShy Judge |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether extension of time for depositing imposed fine should be granted.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jaihind, S/o Chaitar Jaiswal
State of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station Chhaviyani
P. Samkosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
