Dismissed
Karmu Rathia v. State
Chhattisgarh HCCRA/1683/2000
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal filed on behalf of Karmu Radiya abated due to his death during hospital treatment, with no application for substitution filed; appeal dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Appeal abated and dismissed due to death of appellant with no substitution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
- a;
¶2
- a
¶3
- if/fi’iL”£'!Q§llQL’L/’1!' CiruPx \g(8‘ g
¶4
- W <sup>DAg;
¶5
- g1 89(Ja1 12c.J. P R /9~94 APPEAL OF PRISONER \ LQCh
¶6
- STA/0a ‘Vmun \
¶7
- N0...o.o¢n-n‘oauc /<‘9.9... Name —.Wtwfzrm’va
¶8
- Fa Resmence‘S “imi :Wz (2% K f4W.W:U:?_?r WWAge ”3S1mg<75w ‘3 ® =1”)? :c'zv‘
¶9
- Sgntenced to-g¥m¢— EJ/gk—WW _ _ _ 0n -v-‘/‘z§ é~‘2‘vcr@ v — Under Sectlon .- m. — --— .-.. -.. _* -{.. _- b V 15.17? r7‘wzuir W ) ’It ls explalned to the prlsoner thQt 1f he states he w1shes ta
¶10
- ‘be ‘notrepresented by a lecal practltloner the aopellate CourtW111 proceedWith the case for seven days unless the legal
¶11
- practltlone‘r appears earller. lf the legal practltloner does net aopear w1th1a s-even days he may not heard at all 1f the Prisoner
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Smt. Sevita Tiwari
- respondent
State of Chhattisgarh
Coram
AI extract
Yatindra Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRA/1683/2000
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court