The High Court disposed of a civil revision under Section 115 CPC. The applicant challenged the trial court's refusal to grant interim custody of a minor child during pending proceedings under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, finding no jurisdictional warrant for interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT
BILASPUR (C.G.)
CivU Revision No. ^ °1 of 2014
APPLICANT/
Plaintiff
<>':
/^f"M\A^.Y-^:' ..^
^y
'Vasant Kumar Singh S/o ShriVirendra Pratap Singh, aged about 35 years, OccupationService in P.G.T. Ensligh, Central School Chudachandpur, Manipur, R/o Q. No. 4D Street No. 19 Zone01, Sector11, Khursipara, (pistric^ - Bhilai •l^J- -S?^9^-. (C.G.)
^
VERSUS
NON-APPLICANTS/
-^" Defendant
Smt. Kavita Singh W/o Shri-
Defendant no. 2 2. Shreyansh Kumar Singh @ '^ Prafijay S/o Shri- Vasant Kumar Singh, aged about 6 years, Both R/o D.M.Q. 28 Hospital Colony, Vishranipur, Distt. Surajpur
(C.G.)
CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF CODE OF
CFVIL PROCEDURE
3^?'^ww<f,•SThwiis, (sf^iyy
N&-S°)/^ ••/•
| 31R!?T 'WK | ||
|---|---|---|
| 'chrafcFih'^^^ | ||
| 3)1^1?iT Pi-ii'* wsn^i shw'h |
^aiw^if?d sn^i | 1TFRTFtf.fe <>iR ^aifgq 311^1 |
| SB: Hon'&!eShrl>!usS uoey Heard on admisst |
t:eSanla¥.K,.Asr3wa1 , on , counse! for the applicant/plalntifr. |
|
| passed 26-A/2C No.2. plaintiff filed by Firsi Addit |
3V which 9 t trial Court. (2) T legality in the order i Section 6 ofthe Hindi togrant interim custoc "(3) After hearing ie jn exercise of Its rev child, it wouid be exp suit within a period of this order. |
|
| !n viewofabove, | ||
| Sd/- | ||
| SanjayK.Agrawal Judge |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether this Court should exercise inherent jurisdiction to direct the trial Court to dispose of the pending custody application within six months.
Whether the refusal to grant interim custody under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 is legally sustainable.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vasant Kumar Singh
Kavita Singh
Shreyansh Kumar Singh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
