Petitioner sought permission to withdraw this contempt case under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act. The High Court granted the prayer, dismissing the case as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the contempt case was allowed; the case was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
(CHHATTISGARH)
Contempt Case (C) No. Aga? /2013.
(Arisingoutofarderdated26.06. 13 passedinwrit petition (S)No.1696/2013andorderdated6.08.13 passedinWrit petition (S)No.2369/2013 passedby Hon’ble High Court.)
PETITIONER:
Willaim Ekka, son of Francis Ekka, y aged about 49 years, residence of Civil Line, Dharamjaigarh, P.S. Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, working as Registry Clerk, Deputy Registrar Office, Dharamjaigarh, P.S. Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
Versus
Respondent (Contemnor)
4 (
CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT.
Wmmnég)" Ul ../(g man was v1 20
amt we“ (W)
311nm? tmm' ’ ‘fsra IFWR
mmwm
as aim Maw:
1 0.02.201 4
Shri Ajeet Kumar Yadav, A vocate for the petitioner.
Shri Q. Aziz, Advocate fort e respondents.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the p titioner seeks permission of this
Court to withdraw the contempt ca vr
The prays is allowed.
Accordingly, the contempt c ase is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sdl—
gout am Bhadul‘i
'
Judge
Aks
Willaim Ekka
Shri R.S. Vishwakarma
Shri S.Prakash
Gregory Awtar Shri Bhadauri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
